Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Jeremiah Willcock (jewillco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-08 12:15:03
On Tue, 8 May 2012, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> Hi All,
> As we head toward a modularized Boost, Daniel Pfeifer we on the Ryppl
> project would like confirmation that we've correctly (or at least
> sensibly, when there's no obvious "correct") identified the module
> boundaries in Boost's monolithic SVN repository. If library authors
> could take a few moments to examine the contents of your library's repo
> at https://github.com/boost-lib, and let us know, we'd be most grateful.
graph and graph_parallel are fine; property_map is reasonable except that
the things that are in include/boost/pending should be in that directory
in graph/ instead. Does it make sense to modularize utility to split
things like enable_if out into separate trees like you are doing at the
top level of Boost?
-- Jeremiah Willcock
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk