Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Daniel Pfeifer (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-09 01:44:34
2012/5/8 Jeremiah Willcock <jewillco_at_[hidden]>:
> graph and graph_parallel are fine; property_map is reasonable except that
> the things that are in include/boost/pending should be in that directory in
> graph/ instead. Does it make sense to modularize utility to split things
> like enable_if out into separate trees like you are doing at the top level
> of Boost?
could you please have a look at the modularization manifest file?
As you see, boost/pending is split across several modules.
Should everything be part of graph instead?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk