Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Daniel Pfeifer (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-09 01:44:34


2012/5/8 Jeremiah Willcock <jewillco_at_[hidden]>:
> graph and graph_parallel are fine; property_map is reasonable except that
> the things that are in include/boost/pending should be in that directory in
> graph/ instead.  Does it make sense to modularize utility to split things
> like enable_if out into separate trees like you are doing at the top level
> of Boost?

Jeremiah,

could you please have a look at the modularization manifest file?
https://github.com/ryppl/boost-modularize/blob/master/manifest.txt

As you see, boost/pending is split across several modules.
Should everything be part of graph instead?

cheers, Daniel


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk