Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-08 13:23:54
on Tue May 08 2012, John Maddock <boost.regex-AT-virgin.net> wrote:
>> As we head toward a modularized Boost, Daniel Pfeifer we on the Ryppl
>> project would like confirmation that we've correctly (or at least
>> sensibly, when there's no obvious "correct") identified the module
>> boundaries in Boost's monolithic SVN repository. If library authors
>> could take a few moments to examine the contents of your library's repo
>> at https://github.com/boost-lib, and let us know, we'd be most grateful.
> I haven't tried to use it, but at first glance the files for regex,
> math, type_traits, TR1 and integer all look right. No doubt all the
> relative paths in the docs will be wrong though (if they have full
> relative paths to the headers)?
Probably. That's a good point.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk