Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-08 18:06:23

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> As we head toward a modularized Boost, Daniel Pfeifer we on the Ryppl
> project would like confirmation that we've correctly (or at least
> sensibly, when there's no obvious "correct") identified the module
> boundaries in Boost's monolithic SVN repository.  If library authors
> could take a few moments to examine the contents of your library's repo
> at https://github.com/boost-lib, and let us know, we'd be most grateful.

Filesystem looks fine on Windows 7.

After installing the forwarding header symlinks:

* bootstrap successfully built bjam and b2.
* Filesystem passed all tests with bjam.
* Filesystem passed all tests run with the VC++ 2010 solution found in
boost-root/libs/filesystem/test/msvc10

--Beman