Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Daniel Pfeifer (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-09 15:18:48

2012/5/9 Jeremiah Willcock <jewillco_at_[hidden]>:
> On Wed, 9 May 2012, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
>
>> 2012/5/8 Jeremiah Willcock <jewillco_at_[hidden]>:
>>>
>>> graph and graph_parallel are fine; property_map is reasonable except that
>>> the things that are in include/boost/pending should be in that directory
>>> in
>>> graph/ instead.  Does it make sense to modularize utility to split things
>>> like enable_if out into separate trees like you are doing at the top
>>> level
>>> of Boost?
>>
>>
>> Jeremiah,
>>
>> could you please have a look at the modularization manifest file?
>> https://github.com/ryppl/boost-modularize/blob/master/manifest.txt
>>
>> As you see, boost/pending is split across several modules.
>> Should everything be part of graph instead?
>
>
> All of boost/pending in property_map should be moved to graph, other than
> maybe cstddef.hpp, which might go to core or somewhere.  Otherwise,
> boost/pending seems to me to be split up correctly.

Done.

> -- Jeremiah Willcock
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost