Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Jeremiah Willcock (jewillco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-09 11:43:14

On Wed, 9 May 2012, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:

> 2012/5/8 Jeremiah Willcock <jewillco_at_[hidden]>:
>> graph and graph_parallel are fine; property_map is reasonable except that
>> the things that are in include/boost/pending should be in that directory in
>> graph/ instead.  Does it make sense to modularize utility to split things
>> like enable_if out into separate trees like you are doing at the top level
>> of Boost?
>
> Jeremiah,
>
> could you please have a look at the modularization manifest file?
> https://github.com/ryppl/boost-modularize/blob/master/manifest.txt
>
> As you see, boost/pending is split across several modules.
> Should everything be part of graph instead?

All of boost/pending in property_map should be moved to graph, other than 
maybe cstddef.hpp, which might go to core or somewhere.  Otherwise, 
boost/pending seems to me to be split up correctly.

-- Jeremiah Willcock