Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Jeremiah Willcock (jewillco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-09 11:43:14
On Wed, 9 May 2012, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
> 2012/5/8 Jeremiah Willcock <jewillco_at_[hidden]>:
>> graph and graph_parallel are fine; property_map is reasonable except that
>> the things that are in include/boost/pending should be in that directory in
>> graph/ instead. Does it make sense to modularize utility to split things
>> like enable_if out into separate trees like you are doing at the top level
>> of Boost?
> could you please have a look at the modularization manifest file?
> As you see, boost/pending is split across several modules.
> Should everything be part of graph instead?
All of boost/pending in property_map should be moved to graph, other than
maybe cstddef.hpp, which might go to core or somewhere. Otherwise,
boost/pending seems to me to be split up correctly.
-- Jeremiah Willcock
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk