Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-10 00:14:06

2012/5/8 Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>:
>
> Hi All,
>
> As we head toward a modularized Boost, Daniel Pfeifer we on the Ryppl
> project would like confirmation that we've correctly (or at least
> sensibly, when there's no obvious "correct") identified the module
> boundaries in Boost's monolithic SVN repository.  If library authors
> could take a few moments to examine the contents of your library's repo
> at https://github.com/boost-lib, and let us know, we'd be most grateful.

Conversion looks strange:
There is no numeric_cast header, but there is numeric_cast`s tests.
Lexical cast, implicit cast, and polymorphic casts look good.

-- 
Best regards,
Antony Polukhin