Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Daniel Pfeifer (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-10 02:39:36

2012/5/10 Antony Polukhin <antoshkka_at_[hidden]>:
> 2012/5/8 Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>:
>> Hi All,
>> As we head toward a modularized Boost, Daniel Pfeifer we on the Ryppl
>> project would like confirmation that we've correctly (or at least
>> sensibly, when there's no obvious "correct") identified the module
>> boundaries in Boost's monolithic SVN repository.  If library authors
>> could take a few moments to examine the contents of your library's repo
>> at, and let us know, we'd be most grateful.
> Conversion looks strange:
> There is no numeric_cast header, but there is numeric_cast`s tests.
> Lexical cast, implicit cast, and polymorphic casts look good.

There is no numeric_cast.hpp header in SVN that is used by numeric_cast`s tests.

'boost/cast.hpp' contains this:
// Revision History
// 23 JUn 05 numeric_cast removed and redirected to the new verion
(Fernando Cacciola)

This looks strange, yes. But it is not caused by the modularization.

Cheers, Daniel

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at