Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-10 01:46:02
On 05/09/2012 01:06 PM, Daniel James wrote:
> On 9 May 2012 20:18, Daniel Pfeifer <daniel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> 2012/5/9 Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>:
>>> If symlinks are supported, creates a symbolic
>>> link to the directory.
>> This is fragile. Imagine Graph generates a link at boost/graph and
>> GraphParallel generates a link at boost/graph/parallel.
>> GraphParallel's link will end up in Graph's source directory!
>> There is also the case that multiple libraries provide files in the
>> same directory (eg. boost/pending). They cannot all link the
>> The script should always link individual files. That is dead slow,
>> yes. But it is the only safe approach.
> Have you seen GNU stow? It links directories, but if two packages
> clash, replaces the link with a new directory, and fills that with
That should work. I've tried to implement
it in the attached.
import link ;
symlink boost-utility : utility/include/boost : <location>. ;
symlink boost-graph : graph/include/boost : <location>. ;
I haven't tested this beyond basic
merging of two directories yet. Once
I get it fully working, we should be
able to just add an appropriate glob
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk