Subject: Re: [boost] C++ Standards Committee membership for Boost?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-10 09:16:15
On 10/05/2012 14:55, Beman Dawes wrote:
> Procedurally, that would mean joining the INCITS (www.incits.org)
> PL22.16, which is the US national body for C++ standardization. Boost
> is consider US domiciled in ISO-speak.
Who would pay the fees for this? I don't think Boost has its own
funding, does it?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk