Subject: Re: [boost] C++ Standards Committee membership for Boost?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-10 11:35:57
On 05/10/2012 05:11 PM, Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte wrote:
> But allowing this large definition of boosters to be able to mail the
> C++ committee mailing list
> would then open a breach for them, wouldn't it?
It would probably be any Booster who has a compelling reason to get on
board, such as a candidate proposal.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk