Subject: Re: [boost] C++ Standards Committee membership for Boost?
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-10 11:11:09
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> My definition of a "Booster" is anyone who has been participating in
> Boost, and the admittedly vague definition of "participating" is very
> broad, and goes far beyond library authors.
Wouldn't it be a problem for the C++ commitee?
My understanding it that the mailing list is voluntarily kept closed to
a lot of problem like trolling or out-of-scope subjects that occur
open communities (even boost). I might be wrong, I didn't read any official
info about this.
But allowing this large definition of boosters to be able to mail the
C++ committee mailing list
would then open a breach for them, wouldn't it?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk