Subject: Re: [boost] [result_of, phoenix] Inconsistency between result_of and tr1_result_of
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-16 20:45:59
On 5/16/2012 5:15 AM, Michel Morin wrote:
> Shouldn't we provide specializations for both `result_of` and
> `tr1_result_of` to make result_of and tr1_result_of equivalent?
Yes. Can you file bug reports?
> (Additional question: Should we avoid the specialization of result_of
> when we use decltype-based result_of?)
Probably. More bug reports, please! :-)
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk