Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [result_of, phoenix] Inconsistency between result_of and tr1_result_of
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-16 20:45:59

On 5/16/2012 5:15 AM, Michel Morin wrote:

> Shouldn't we provide specializations for both `result_of` and
> `tr1_result_of` to make result_of and tr1_result_of equivalent?

Yes. Can you file bug reports?

> (Additional question: Should we avoid the specialization of result_of
> when we use decltype-based result_of?)

Probably. More bug reports, please! :-)

Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at