|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [result_of, phoenix] Inconsistency between result_of and tr1_result_of
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-17 11:13:34
Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Shouldn't we provide specializations for both `result_of` and
>> `tr1_result_of` to make result_of and tr1_result_of equivalent?
>
> Yes. Can you file bug reports?
>
>> (Additional question: Should we avoid the specialization of result_of
>> when we use decltype-based result_of?)
>
> Probably. More bug reports, please! :-)
Done.
[Add tr1_result_of specialization and avoid
specialization of decltype-based result_of]
* Functional/Forward
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6909
* Fusion
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6910
* Phoenix V3
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6911
* Phoenix V2
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6912
[Avoid specialization of decltype-based result_of]
* Proto
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6913
[Feature request: Add result_of and tr1_result_of
specializations for nullary function calls]
* Lambda
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6914
Regards,
Michel
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk