Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jeffrey.hellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-19 19:01:24
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> And of course I'm still smarting from having the BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS
> definition change while I wasn't looking to from what has always been
> documented in a way that makes some sense to something that
> I still dont' get.
> So I stand behind my suggestions.
Sorry, I've only been glossing over this discussion. Can someone please
clarify how BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS has changed, what specific change Robert
(and possibly others) find troubling, and what practical consequences this
has had or presently has? Ditto for boost::throw_exception.
(For the record, I've glanced at the blurbs on BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS within
Boost.Config and Boost.Exception and it's difficult for me to parse what
effect their differences have in practice, and it sounds like others have a
good idea what the problem seems to be.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk