Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-20 19:56:14
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It is clear that you don't approve of the current definition of
> boost::throw_exception. That's fine, you don't have to use it, but if
> you want to criticize it, it'd help if you first understand it.
> Otherwise you end up making unsubstantiated claims, rather than
> pointing out real problems.
lol - I haven't critcised boost exception. I only understand it in
the very vaguest terms. I've said this in as many ways as I can
think of. I don't know what else to do.
I have criticised the way it's introduction into boost was handled.
The few posts in the thread which have addressed my critcism
have failed to convince me that I'm off track here.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk