Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-20 21:17:39

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > It is clear that you don't approve of the current definition of
> > boost::throw_exception. That's fine, you don't have to use it, but if
> > you want to criticize it, it'd help if you first understand it.
> > Otherwise you end up making unsubstantiated claims, rather than
> > pointing out real problems.
>
> lol - I haven't critcised boost exception. I only understand it in
> the very vaguest terms.  I've said this in as many ways as I can
> think of. I don't know what else to do.
>

I'm confused. I thought you were complaining about build times and
dependencies.

I mean, if there is a problem with boost::throw_exception or any other part
of Boost Exception, I'd like to know about it.

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode