Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: TypeErasure (docs, Concept Maps misnamed?)
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-21 10:56:02
On 06/21/12 09:38, Steven Watanabe wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 07:16 AM, Larry Evans wrote:
>> On 05/22/12 15:34, Steven Watanabe wrote:
>>> I'd like to request a formal review of the
>>> TypeErasure library that I've posted about
>>> several times before here.
>>> Online documentation can be found here:
>> The page:
>> with section title, "Concept Maps", seems to be about
>> specializing a builtin concept. I don't see anything
>> in that section about a map.
> a) This applies to any concept, not just
> builtin ones.
OK. I figured as much.
> b) "Concept Map" is the concept term for
In that case, it would have helped me to have
a link to that term definition. I'm not
that familiar with concepts and I'm probably
not the only one reading about type_erasure in that situation.
A google on "c++ concept map" showed:
which would be a good target of the link, or maybe a definition
somewhere else in you documents.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk