Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: TypeErasure (docs, Concept Maps misnamed?)
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-21 11:15:35

Steven Watanabe-4 wrote
> On 06/21/2012 07:16 AM, Larry Evans wrote:
>> On 05/22/12 15:34, Steven Watanabe wrote:
>>> AMDG
>>> I'd like to request a formal review of the
>>> TypeErasure library that I've posted about
>>> several times before here.
>> [snip]
>>> Online documentation can be found here:
>> The page:
>> */libs/type_erasure/doc/html/boost_typeerasure
>> /concept.html#boost_typeerasure.concept.concept_map
>> with section title, "Concept Maps", seems to be about
>> specializing a builtin concept. I don't see anything
>> in that section about a map.
> a) This applies to any concept, not just
> builtin ones.
> b) "Concept Map" is the concept term for
> specialization.

I don't know if what is behind your "Concept Map" couldn't be renamed to
Signature Map as I guess that you are mapping only signatures, and not types
or data members. Am I missing something?


View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at