Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: TypeErasure (docs, Concept Maps misnamed?)
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-21 11:15:35
Steven Watanabe-4 wrote
> On 06/21/2012 07:16 AM, Larry Evans wrote:
>> On 05/22/12 15:34, Steven Watanabe wrote:
>>> I'd like to request a formal review of the
>>> TypeErasure library that I've posted about
>>> several times before here.
>>> Online documentation can be found here:
>> The page:
>> with section title, "Concept Maps", seems to be about
>> specializing a builtin concept. I don't see anything
>> in that section about a map.
> a) This applies to any concept, not just
> builtin ones.
> b) "Concept Map" is the concept term for
I don't know if what is behind your "Concept Map" couldn't be renamed to
Signature Map as I guess that you are mapping only signatures, and not types
or data members. Am I missing something?
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Formal-Review-Request-TypeErasure-tp4630373p4631628.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk