Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-22 13:25:33
On 22 June 2012 18:30, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Stewart, Robert wrote:
>> The more dependencies you
>> introduce, the more fragile your code becomes, but there's a great
>> deal of benefit to reuse, too. The only issue in this case is that
>> one can reasonably expect a top-level header to avoid dependencies on
> Personally I wouldn't say it's the only issue. But I'm glad we can
> agree that it's its a BIG issue.
There are a lot of headers violating your rule. What problems has it caused?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk