Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-22 16:40:19
Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Fri Jun 22 2012, Daniel James <dnljms-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>> There are a lot of headers violating your rule.
> Most notably, there are plenty of aggregate headers that do this.
In a previous post, I specifically excluded "convenience headers" from
being considered as "violating" this "rule". They are not at issue here.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk