Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-22 16:13:43
On 22 June 2012 15:40, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> In a previous post, I specifically excluded "convenience headers" from
> being considered as "violating" this "rule". They are not at issue here.
You keep asserting this, but I haven't seen you explain *what* makes the
convenience headers so special that they do not violate your rule.
-- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]> (847) 691-1404
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk