Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-22 16:13:43

On 22 June 2012 15:40, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> In a previous post, I specifically excluded "convenience headers" from
> being considered as "violating" this "rule". They are not at issue here.

You keep asserting this, but I haven't seen you explain *what* makes the
convenience headers so special that they do not violate your rule.

 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  (847) 691-1404

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at