Subject: Re: [boost] [1.50.0] Release candidates available for testing
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-26 07:01:00
On 26 June 2012 11:19, Jurko GospodnetiÄ <jurko.gospodnetic_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Â I think that was the intended behaviour all along (to have both versioned
> and unversioned library variants built when the --layout=versioned is
> requested) but there were some typos in code that were silently causing the
> unversioned variants not to be built as expected.
> Â Â Â Â https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6027
I don't know enough about this to say if this is the case here, but
non-trivial fixes for long standing bugs aren't really appropriate for
the beta period. Particularly if they change behaviour.
> Â Â Â Â https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/78937
> Â Â Â Â https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/78938
More changes than those were merged to release:
Mostly whitespace changes? But the changes to 'make-unversioned-links'
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk