Subject: Re: [boost] Policy proposal: All user-visible exceptions should be thrown through BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION
From: Brian Wood (woodbrian77_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-26 13:24:15
< snip >
> Cons for 1) and 2):
> - Always paying for the cost of #including <boost/throw_exception.hpp>
> - All libraries are dependent on - and therefore become vulnerable to any
> future breakages (if any) in - Boost.Exception.
Is there a penalty for single threaded applications here? There's
been discussion of the support for transferring exceptions between
threads; are there aspects of that support that are unneeded in a
single threaded context?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk