Subject: Re: [boost] [1.51][Release] Short release cycle
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-29 13:35:17
Am 29.06.2012 16:44, schrieb KTC:
> On 29/06/2012 12:07, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
>>> Not yet, there's a few things we need to sort out. The most important
>>> is that the regression test results are good. Can you mark up expected
>>> failures in 'status/explicit-failures-markup.xml' (remember to check
>>> the xml before committing, there's instructions at the top of the
>>> file)? Do you have any idea why Visual C++ 10 is failing?
>> You are refering to tests RW_VC10 and RW_Mingw45? This is because the
>> owner of this computers does not have the MASM (assembler) in its
>> search dir.
>> Some regression tests will fail because the platform (for instance
>> architecture SPARC) is not supported (but might be added later).
> I've just tested context on trunk, and it passed (VC10 x64, Win7 x64).
thank you - KTC :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk