Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.51][Release] Short release cycle
From: KTC (ktc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-29 10:44:39


On 29/06/2012 12:07, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
>> Not yet, there's a few things we need to sort out. The most important
>> is that the regression test results are good. Can you mark up expected
>> failures in 'status/explicit-failures-markup.xml' (remember to check
>> the xml before committing, there's instructions at the top of the
>> file)? Do you have any idea why Visual C++ 10 is failing?
>
> You are refering to tests RW_VC10 and RW_Mingw45? This is because the owner of this computers does not have the MASM (assembler) in its search dir.
>
> Some regression tests will fail because the platform (for instance architecture SPARC) is not supported (but might be added later).
>

I've just tested context on trunk, and it passed (VC10 x64, Win7 x64).

KTC


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk