Subject: Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Some rvalue reference experiments (performance inhancements #1)
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-30 14:16:56
On 06/30/2012 11:08 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>> The safe solution is returning Number, not Number&&. If Dave reads
>> this message, he can probably point us to previous discussions about
>> this. Being able to return Number&& would be great...
> Can you explain why it's unsafe given that we know that the value
> returned is an rvalue ref already?
I'm guessing that it has something to
do with temporary lifetimes?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk