Subject: Re: [boost] [1.51][Release] Short release cycle
From: Steve Ramsey (steve_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-30 15:36:40
On Jun 30, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Lars Viklund wrote:
> I'm just fearing that there'll be more premature C++11 taint by the day
> in Boost, making it less and less usable on C++03 as versions come out.
My thinking on this is that just because you're forced to live in a cave and code on bongos is no reason why I can't have nice things. Besides, it's a bit difficult to "establish 'existing practice' and provide reference implementations so that Boost libraries are suitable for eventual standardization" when you aren't even targeting the current standard.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk