Re: [boost] [1.51][Release] Short release cycle

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.51][Release] Short release cycle
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-07 07:51:36

Am 07.07.2012 13:16, schrieb Daniel James:
> On 7 July 2012 12:07, Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Am 29.06.2012 20:14, schrieb Daniel James:
>>
>>> That's the kind of thing that should be put in
>>> explicit-failures-markup.xml. You want something like:
>>>
>>>       <!-- context -->
>>>       <library name="context">
>>>         <mark-unusable>
>>>           <toolset name="cray*"/>
>>>           <toolset name="intel-linux*"/>
>>>           <note author="Oliver Kowalke">
>>>             This platform is not supported (but might be added later).
>>>           </note>
>>>         </mark-unusable>
>>>       </library>
>>>
>>> The asterisk in 'cray*' can only come at the end.
>>
>> Is it possible to express: architectures (not only toolsets) different from
>> 'intel', 'ppc', 'arm' and 'mips' are not supported?
> No, you can only match against the 'library/toolset' row of the
> results table. If you can't make an appropriate match, then it's
> probably best to leave it. You could possibly put a check in the build
> files so that the tests just aren't run. That will presumably leave an
> empty space for that column, although I'm not sure.
>
OK - I've already pre-processor statements (#error) but I'll try to 
adapt the Jamfile accordingly too.

regards,
Oliver