Re: [boost] [lockfree] include into 1.51?

Subject: Re: [boost] [lockfree] include into 1.51?
From: KTC (ktc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-09 13:57:35

On 09/07/2012 14:50, Tim Blechmann wrote:
>>>>> boost.lockfree is now in trunk and it passes the tests on most supported
>>>>> platforms. atm it includes a private copy of boost.atomic, which will be
>>>>> removed once boost.atomic is merged (helge wanted to do it quite soon)
>>>>> ... there are still some test failures on win32, but i think i found the
>>>>> reason and fixed the tests (btw it is rather time consuming to work with
>>>>> the test farm as the win32 tests are only run about once a week).
>>> It's doing better but "stack overflow"?
>>>
>>> <http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/output/KTC-Win7x64_VC10x64-boost-bin-v2-libs-lockfree-test-queue_test-test-msvc-10-0-debug-address-model-64-threading-multi.html>
>>> <http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/output/KTC-Win7x64_VC10x64-boost-bin-v2-libs-lockfree-test-stack_test-test-msvc-10-0-debug-address-model-64-threading-multi.html>
>>
>> same `stack overflow' that i've seen in some other win32 tests ... it
>> seems that win32 does not like that to allocate large objects on the
>> stack ...
>
> should be fixed

Fixed "stack test", but "queue test" still fail. Doesn't really say why 
though.

<http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/output/KTC-Win7x64_VC10x64-boost-bin-v2-libs-lockfree-test-queue_test-test-msvc-10-0-debug-address-model-64-threading-multi.html>

KTC