Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Add BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro?
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-09 12:14:42

Next message: KTC: "Re: [boost] [lockfree] include into 1.51?"
Previous message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [chrono] time_point.hpp depends on Boost.System; should it?"
In reply to: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] [config] Add BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro?"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [config] Add BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro?"

[Beman Dawes]
> Is it OK to add a BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro to trunk?

[Marshall Clow]
> 1) Can you just test for c++11 support? Range based for loops are pretty basic
> #if __cplusplus >= 201103L

VC11 supports range-for, but defines __cplusplus to 199711.

STL

Next message: KTC: "Re: [boost] [lockfree] include into 1.51?"
Previous message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [chrono] time_point.hpp depends on Boost.System; should it?"
In reply to: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] [config] Add BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro?"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [config] Add BOOST_NO_RANGE_BASED_FOR macro?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk