Subject: Re: [boost] Merging to release
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-15 10:25:49
> btw. since you're renaming things, shouldn't BOOST_NO_CXX11_SMART_PTR
> be BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_MEMORY?
cannot comment on this specific case, but the presence of a header is
one thing, the implementation is another:
* some compilers provide <atomic> but with an implementation that is
* some compilers (at least gcc-4.3) implement rvalue references, but stl
containers do not provide emplace semantics. so one does not have
precise control via BOOST_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk