Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a tweener library
From: Lars Viklund (zao_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-19 06:11:58
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:03:01PM +0200, Julien Jorge wrote:
> Le Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:37:52 +0200,
> Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte <mjklaim_at_[hidden]> a Ã©crit :
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Julien Jorge
> > <julien.jorge_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> > > Is there an interest to add this tweener library to Boost and what
> > > would be the adaptations to do?
> > >
> > Are you planning to work on this library soon?
> > As I said before, I'm really interested into this library.
> > I think I'll need something like it for my new project soon (not sure
> > when, but it might be in 2 or 3 weeks) .
> > So if you have an online repository where this library would be
> > isolated, and at least would be templated as asked, I'm willing to
> > try it ASAP and help it's development.
> I had no plan to work on it before September but since you are willing
> to help I will try to start the transition before the end of the next
> Is there some guidelines to write code for boost, especially in the
> directory structure? Should I put the code of the templatized classes
> in the .hpp or can I keep the .hpp/.tpp separation?
FWIW, the convention in the tree seems to be .ipp for secular templates.
There might be some guidelines you wish to look at, like tab style,
macro naming, casing, license directives, detail namespace naming, etc.
-- Lars Viklund | zao_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk