Subject: Re: [boost] [date_time] Who is in charge?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-19 12:07:41
On 07/19/2012 02:06 AM, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> At present is it nobody's job (or everyone's job?) and the result is not really good enough.
> So if someone (or two) is willing to take on the task, and we have reasonable confidence in them, we
> should 'appoint' them (and 'sack' them if it goes badly). At least we can revert to some previous
> known-ok-ish state.
Who is "we?" Someone still has to take responsibility
for making these decisions, which brings us back to
the original problem.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk