[boost] [TypeErasure]_self

Subject: [boost] [TypeErasure]_self
From: Markus Werle (numerical.simulation_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-22 11:27:17

Hi Steven,

In 
[docs]/type_erasure/libs/type_erasure/doc/html/boost_typeerasure/feedback.html 
you ask for feedback:

I would be perfectly happy with _ instead of _self. 
You would be in sync with the folks that wrote C# Reactive Extensions 
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/gg577611)
who have the convention that _ stands for "unused", which it is here, too.

To me 
 constructible<_(const std::string&)> 
reads fine.

Markus