Re: [boost] [1.51.0] Beta 1 release candidates available

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.51.0] Beta 1 release candidates available
From: Tom Kent (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-01 20:47:43

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Tom Kent <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>
>> Release candidate files for 1.51.0 beta 1 are available at
>> http://boost.cowic.de/rc/
>>
>> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download
>> the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report
>> both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
>>
>> This helps ensure the candidates build OK before we push them out to
>> SourceForge.
>>
>> The files (and associated md5s) are:
>>         543e3498c4ce520bfa635607971be4fc
>>  boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1.tar.gz
>>         3f9beb290dad223c21822e9ef601fd80
>>  boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1.tar.bz2
>>         0401b9c40aac37b7dd9ef7e33190270c        boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1.zip
>>         e5aa1cd82e71173197ee6794c2c035d2        boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1.7z
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --The release managers
>>
>>
> Could we change the directory that is packed into the zipped archive to be
> the same as the archive name?  For example, if we have
> boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1.tar.gz the directory name should be
> boost_1_51_0_beta1_rc1 not simply boost_1_51_0_beta1.
>
> The only reason I ask is because my build script expects it...if there's
> good reasons for making rc's have a different archive name I'm open to it.
>
> Tom Kent
>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>>
>
>

My mistake. This was only a problem with the _rc2 files, the _rc1 files are
actually how I asked for them.  Is this a bug in the build for _rc2?
Tom