Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)

Subject: Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)
From: Robert Jones (robertgbjones_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-09 11:49:10

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:
> boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Steven
> > Watanabe
> > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:52 PM
> > To: boost_at_[hidden]
> > Subject: Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)
> >
> > AMDG
> >
> > On 08/09/2012 02:27 AM, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> > >
> > > Should the unary plus be included for completeness?
> > >
> >
> > Sure.  What should it be called?
>
> plusable
>
> perhaps?
>
> I can't think of any better.
>
>
unaryaddable maybe?

- Rob.