Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)

Subject: Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-18 20:53:42

on Thu Aug 09 2012, Robert Jones <robertgbjones-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:
>> boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Steven
>> > Watanabe
>> > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:52 PM
>> > To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> > Subject: Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)
>> >
>> > AMDG
>> >
>> > On 08/09/2012 02:27 AM, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Should the unary plus be included for completeness?
>> > >
>> >
>> > Sure.  What should it be called?
>>
>> plusable
>>
>> perhaps?
>>
>> I can't think of any better.
>>
>>
> unaryaddable maybe?

I don't think unary plus can be considered an addition.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing                  Software Development        Training
http://www.boostpro.com             Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers  C++  Boost