Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)

Subject: Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)
From: Alexander Lamaison (awl03_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-19 03:48:43

Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:

> on Thu Aug 09 2012, Robert Jones <robertgbjones-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Paul A. Bristow
>> <pbristow_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:
>>> boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Steven
>>> > Watanabe
>>> > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:52 PM
>>> > To: boost_at_[hidden]
>>> > Subject: Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)
>>> >
>>> > AMDG
>>> >
>>> > On 08/09/2012 02:27 AM, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Should the unary plus be included for completeness?
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > Sure.  What should it be called?
>>>
>>> plusable
>>>
>>> perhaps?
>>>
>>> I can't think of any better.
>>>
>>>
>> unaryaddable maybe?
>
> I don't think unary plus can be considered an addition.

Posatable (complement of negatable) ;)

Alex

--
Swish - Easy SFTP for Windows Explorer