Re: [boost] [rational] Over/underflow checked update ready for comments

Subject: Re: [boost] [rational] Over/underflow checked update ready for comments
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-25 09:16:05

Dan Searles wrote:
>
> Quick overview of the update: the original usage and
> code of the template class remains mostly as before, ie
> boost::rational<int> RationalVar; should work as
> in the original version. Adding 'true' as a second
> template parameter, however, allows an exception to
> be raised if an operation with a class variable results
> in a value that can't accurately be represented

I haven't looked at anything else, but I dislike using true/false as the template argument.  I'd prefer meaningful names.

_____
Rob Stewart                           robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  http://www.sig.com

________________________________

IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.