Subject: [boost] [odeint] support for Sundials?
From: Daniel Herring (dherring_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-29 09:21:09
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Mario Mulansky wrote:
> after getting some good amount of positive feedback on our talk at
> boostcon we are now asking for a formal review process of the odeint
> library, currently hosted on github:
I found your page comparing performance with other Runge-Kutta
The documentation indicates you have support for various types of stepper.
Have you considered whether the odeint API could act as an interface to
CVODE or CVODES in Sundials?
If that works, then it validates the odeint API. If there are gaps or
inefficiencies, then they may indicate improvements for odeint.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk