Re: [boost] [context] boost::ctx::?

Subject: Re: [boost] [context] boost::ctx::?
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-14 19:22:41

Le 15/09/12 00:09, Jamie Allsop a écrit :
> [snip]
>
>>> If the namespace is changed, I will prefer that the name convey the
>>> functionality behind the context class. We can have a lot of context.
>>> The functionality is close to a continuation context, but I don't know
>>> if it implements it completely, so maybe continuation could be
>>> considered.
>> 'continuation' would be longer than 'context' - is a short namespace not
>> preferable?
>> The same applies to 'coroutines' - I would prefer 'coro'.
>
> FWIW - I think 'coro' is cryptic at best. It is neither an 
> abbreviation nor an actual word, merely a truncation. As others have 
> said, if you want something shorter for clarity in a local context, 
> use an alias.
>
>
+1

Vicente