Re: [boost] Interest in a GPU computing library

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a GPU computing library
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-18 06:12:05

Beren Minor wrote:
> This seems interesting, but what would be the advantages over Thrust
> for example, which offers a very stl-like interface (not entirely sure
> if it is fully stl-compliant)?
> Your example looks a lot like Thrust, so I'm asking if there are
> anything new or anything that is Boost specific.
>

This might be a big advantage of the new library. Thrust probably isn't 
using any of the boost features (I didn't dive into docs) and won't do 
it in the future.

Regards,
Adam