Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [coroutine] new versions
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-05 21:54:28

On Oct 5, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Giovanni Piero Deretta <gpderetta_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>>> Anyway, maybe the use of the get accessor can be made more readable
>> without effort using tags
>> does boost.tuple provide such a facility?
> no, but boost.fusion does. Maybe coroutine should only support unary
> arguments/results and let the user choose its preferred "packaging" by
> explicitly specifying tuple or fusion map/sets?

That would greatly simplify things. You wouldn't need to worry about signature inversion, the parameterization is streamlined, and accessing the argument can be reduced to an arg() accessor.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at