Re: [boost] [coroutine] new versions

Subject: Re: [boost] [coroutine] new versions
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-06 03:53:47

Am 06.10.2012 03:54, schrieb Rob Stewart:
> On Oct 5, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Giovanni Piero Deretta <gpderetta_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>>
>>>> Anyway, maybe the use of the get accessor can be made more readable
>>> without effort using tags
>>> does boost.tuple provide such a facility?
>>>
>> no, but boost.fusion does. Maybe coroutine should only support unary
>> arguments/results and let the user choose its preferred "packaging" by
>> explicitly specifying tuple or fusion map/sets?
>>
> +1
>
> That would greatly simplify things. You wouldn't need to worry about signature inversion, the parameterization is streamlined, and accessing the argument can be reduced to an arg() accessor.
coroutine<>::caller_t is a typedef of coroutine<> with inverted 
signature - you don't need to worry