Re: [boost] [preprocessor] Variadics suggestion

Subject: Re: [boost] [preprocessor] Variadics suggestion
From: Giovanni Piero Deretta (gpderetta_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-08 12:16:07

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Paul Mensonides <pmenso57_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:49:40 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
>
> >> 2) For a macro library, do we still need to have a BOOST_ prefix or
> >> could I just keep the CHAOS_PP_ prefix?  I cannot use BOOST_PP_ without
> >> bending over backwards to find contrived names for everything, and the
> >> namespace of brief names beginning with BOOST_ is tiny--especially when
> >> a library provides hundreds of user-interface (i.e. not implementation
> >> detail macros).
> >
> > BOOST_CHAOS_PP_... seems normal to me.
>
> It seems *way* to long to me.
>

BOOST_CH_...

Like BOOST_PP stands for Boost.PreProcessor, BOOST_CH could stand for
BOOST_CHAOS

/bikeshed

-- gpd

>
> -Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>