[boost] [contract] concepts: pseudo-signatures vs. usage patterns

Subject: [boost] [contract] concepts: pseudo-signatures vs. usage patterns
From: Lorenzo Caminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-10 13:08:16

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> on Tue Oct 09 2012, Lorenzo Caminiti <lorcaminiti-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I made a first attempt to sketch how N3351-like concepts will look
>> into Boost.Contract (just for the find algorithm and its concepts for
>> now):
>> [...]
>> Please tell me what you think now
>
> Since you asked what I think,
>
>   "pseudo-signatures > usage patterns"

Hello all,

Can we write down pros and cons for concepts implemented via
pseudo-signatures (C++0x-like and Boost.Generic) vs. usage patterns
(N3351 and Boost.Contract)?

Who wants to start? Matt, Dave, Andrzej, ... I can compile a qbk table
with what we discuss.

Thanks.
--Lorenzo