Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Gennadiy Rozenal (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-20 15:47:22

Robert Ramey <ramey <at> rrsd.com> writes:

> 
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
> >> I. New testing tool BOOST_CHECKA
> How about BOOST_CHECK_EXPRESSION ?

Kinda too long. And I'd like BOOST_CHECK_ASSERTION better if we are going with 
long name
 
> >> II. New "data driven test case" subsystem
> >> BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE( t1, samples1, sample )
> BOOST_TEST_FOREACH(<test?>, <collection>, <item name>) ?

1. I already use this macro since the time before BOOST_FOREACH was introduced 
into trunk
2. The name should really convey that this a test case
3. Data test case can have arbitrary arity. Foreach may look ambiguous in such 
scenario.

Gennadiy