Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Gennadiy Rozenal (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-22 05:57:23

Antony Polukhin <antoshkka <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 
> 2012/10/20 Gennadiy Rozenal <rogeeff <at> gmail.com>:
> > BOOST_CHECKA( var1 - var2 >= 12 );
> Great feature, but if it uses same error reporting mechanism as before
> it is totally useless (see ticket #7046). 512 bytes is not enough for
> such reports, please base error report buffer on std::string or some
> other class, that can auto extend it`s size.

I know everyone have their own personal favorite ticket, but how is this 
particular one has anything to do with this tool? This tool does not report 
exceptions. And I wouldn't call an existing exception reporting mechanism 
totally useless as well, because it works fine for many many scenarios. 
We'll see how the one in the ticket can be addressed as well.

Gennadiy