Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-22 06:10:02

>>> So here we go:
>>> I. New testing tool BOOST_CHECKA
>> I like this a lot. How it works?
> A bit of expression template magic, plus some c++11 for advanced type deduction.
>> What about BOOST_TEST_CHECK (see above)?
> Again this is 2 verbs stuck together. I can live with this, but this is not as
> good as BOOST_CHECK ;o)
> One option I thought about is to introduce a mode where this new tool is named
> BOOST_CHECK and old BOOST_CHECK is renamed into BOOST_CHECK_...something.

Sounds like a good option. It won't break anything, will it?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at